Zune Boards - View Single Post

yensed · 12-04-2007, 09:31 AM

Even if the Zune80 would have came ahead, The iPodC would have still been right behind it. These 2 devices are so similar in so many ways. For every positive feature one of the devices has, it has a lacks in another area. The iPodC allows full access to its HDD which is extremely convenient, but it has a small screen which isn't fun to watch videos on. Whereas the Zune80 allows no access to its HDD, but has a nice large screen. Or EQ+Basic functionality(iPod) Vs. Radio+Wireless Sync(Zune). This is actually a very good thing for the Zune.

P.S. I do agree, Zune80>>>iPod Classic(80GB).

12-04-2007, 09:31 AM	#15 (permalink)
yensed Anti-Fanboy Retired Staff Zune Freak Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Coos Bay, Oregon. Posts: 1,050 Reputation: 35 $zB: 192 Donate	Even if the Zune80 would have came ahead, The iPodC would have still been right behind it. These 2 devices are so similar in so many ways. For every positive feature one of the devices has, it has a lacks in another area. The iPodC allows full access to its HDD which is extremely convenient, but it has a small screen which isn't fun to watch videos on. Whereas the Zune80 allows no access to its HDD, but has a nice large screen. Or EQ+Basic functionality(iPod) Vs. Radio+Wireless Sync(Zune). This is actually a very good thing for the Zune. P.S. I do agree, Zune80>>>iPod Classic(80GB). __________________ *To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.* Last edited by yensed : 12-04-2007 at 09:39 AM.